John Edwards, aspiring dictator-in-chief, is so compassionate he is going to create universal healthcare, housing vouchers, universal pre-K and college, universal this and that, and so forth.
If you are so compassionate, why don't you donate your own fortune to the poor and needy? But alas, he wants to demonstrate his compassion by forcing everyone else to pay for all of this crap. It's no wonder the middle class can't afford anything. After all, government at all levels steals about half of what your average person makes in taxes so it's no wonder that people can't afford healthcare and education as it is right now (I agree that the healthcare issue is a bit more complex than this but this is certainly a major contributor). Moreover, I am sure that many of these things will most likely become compulsory judging from the fact that he thinks everyone should go to the doctor at gunpoint. So not only does he want me to pay for everyone else's education and housing, he thinks that my children and myself are his own private property to teach, medicate, and store away as he pleases. My family and I are not your personal property, asshole.
By the way, I like the way he says there is "no free meal." What is this supposed to mean? If I work hard for my fraudulent federal reserve notes and you STEAL it from me to redistribute it to somebody else, are you saying that I am not entitled to complain because everyone else is equally being molested by the all intrusive state? Indeed, it seems as if there is "no free meal" insofar as keeping the fruits of ones own labor is concerned. And don't give me this nonsense about the good of society. If you want to talk about morality, let's begin the the ABCs. It is wrong to steal.
If you are so concerned about the good of society (whatever that actually means), why bother spending millions and millions of dollars running in an election when you could devote your time to help the poor with your own assets. He tries so hard to make it seem as if he is compassionate but he is really a thieving snake who just wants to exercise power and micromanage everyones life. So take your socialism and phony compassionate whateverism and SHOVE IT!
''We seek him here, we seek him there, Those Frenchies seek him everywhere. Is he in heaven? —Is he in hell? That demmed, elusive Pimpernel.''
Tell us how you really feel...I could not agree more actually
ReplyDeleteWell, I was a little irritated when I read that article as you may surmise. The sad thing is that while Hillary is a kook, I think that Edwards is even more of a nut. The big difference is that Edwards is a pretty boy who tries to come across as a down to earth kind of guy, at least compared to Hillary.
ReplyDeleteHillary, on the other hand, is a pompous "I know how to run the universe and everything therein better than anyone else" kind of politician. She is very elite and everything that comes out of her mouth reeks with arrogance. Hilarry is really quite moderate compared with some of the other Democrats in the race like Mike Gravel or Edwards. And God help us because Hillary isn't all that great.