That our continued liberty ultimately depends on liberty elsewhere seems an inarguable, if inconvenient, truth. ~Kathleen Parker
Daniel Larison makes an excellent argument against the "inarguable".
But just think about the idea for a moment: why in the world would our liberty depend on liberty in any other nation? It’s not as if there is some gigantic Liberty Web to which we all belong where each part depends on every other part. There is no liberty in Zimbabwe; does that mean that our liberty will be forever imperiled and diminished until Zimbabwe has been set right? To ask the question is to recognise that the claim is absurd.
No comments:
Post a Comment